edge_current_flow_betweenness_centrality_subset

edge_current_flow_betweenness_centrality_subset(G, sources, targets, normalized=True, weight='weight', dtype=<type 'float'>, solver='lu')[source]

Compute current-flow betweenness centrality for edges using subsets of nodes.

Current-flow betweenness centrality uses an electrical current model for information spreading in contrast to betweenness centrality which uses shortest paths.

Current-flow betweenness centrality is also known as random-walk betweenness centrality [2].

Parameters:
  • G (graph) – A NetworkX graph
  • sources (list of nodes) – Nodes to use as sources for current
  • targets (list of nodes) – Nodes to use as sinks for current
  • normalized (bool, optional (default=True)) – If True the betweenness values are normalized by b=b/(n-1)(n-2) where n is the number of nodes in G.
  • weight (string or None, optional (default=’weight’)) – Key for edge data used as the edge weight. If None, then use 1 as each edge weight.
  • dtype (data type (float)) – Default data type for internal matrices. Set to np.float32 for lower memory consumption.
  • solver (string (default=’lu’)) – Type of linear solver to use for computing the flow matrix. Options are “full” (uses most memory), “lu” (recommended), and “cg” (uses least memory).
Returns:

nodes – Dictionary of edge tuples with betweenness centrality as the value.

Return type:

dictionary

Notes

Current-flow betweenness can be computed in O(I(n-1)+mn log n) time [1], where I(n-1) is the time needed to compute the inverse Laplacian. For a full matrix this is O(n^3) but using sparse methods you can achieve O(nm{sqrt k}) where k is the Laplacian matrix condition number.

The space required is O(nw) where `w is the width of the sparse Laplacian matrix. Worse case is w=n for O(n^2).

If the edges have a ‘weight’ attribute they will be used as weights in this algorithm. Unspecified weights are set to 1.

References

[1]Centrality Measures Based on Current Flow. Ulrik Brandes and Daniel Fleischer, Proc. 22nd Symp. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS ‘05). LNCS 3404, pp. 533-544. Springer-Verlag, 2005. http://www.inf.uni-konstanz.de/algo/publications/bf-cmbcf-05.pdf
[2]A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks, M. E. J. Newman, Social Networks 27, 39-54 (2005).